Performance comparison between traditional UI and AIVA’s generative interface with benchmark data.
Metric | Baseline (Conventional UI / Workflow) | AIVA Generative UI | Δ (Gain) |
---|---|---|---|
Task-Execution Latency¹ | TUI = 3.1 s (single RPC + DOM render) | TAIVA ≈ 0.60 s | 5.2 × faster |
Manual Interaction Steps | 7–9 clicks / taps (avg 7.6) | 0 (single prompt) | 100 % reduction |
Multi-Step Automation | Sequential / user-driven | Parallel, RL-optimised | n/a (qualitative) |
State Adaptability | Static (hard-coded) | Live context re-render (≤ 130 ms diff-patch) | — |
Workflow | Legacy (Apps / Time) | AIVA | Effective Speed-up |
---|---|---|---|
Token list → chart → swap | 3 apps / ≈ 5 min | Prompt-chain, 12 sec | ~25 × |
Yield search → stake (3 protocols) | Manual wallet hopping / > 4 min | 8 sec | 30+ × |
Cross-platform hotel + flight booking | 4 sites / ≈ 15 min | 30 sec | ~30 × |